Thanks, Debashish, for the clarification. You are quite right about my own work, in which Sri Aurobindo's framework of thought (which of course I had to formulate in a way that made it directly relevant to my field) offered me an entirely new dimension of comprehension. I asked because I didn't feel addressed by the second half of your post which begins with "If we assume that Sri Aurobindo has no place in this form because nothing measures up to his greatness...."